Graham Hancock’s ‘Ancient Apocalypse’ is a new Netflix sequence wherein the journalist searches for a supposed advanced civilization from prehistory.
What if the whole lot we learn about prehistoric people is wrong? That’s the question journalist Graham Hancock gifts within the new series Ancient Apocalypse, which started streaming on Netflix on Nov. 11. In that series, Hancock treks to archeological sites all over the world in search of an advanced civilization that he suspects existed lengthy sooner than the ancient civilizations we examine in history books.
“For 30 years, I’ve been looking for something I was informed couldn’t perhaps exist: an advanced human civilization, a lot older than our own,” he says within the display. “The mainstream model of history says that once the end of the Ice Age, on their very own initiative, our hunter-gatherer ancestors abruptly started farming and raising farm animals, growing settlements and ultimately cities, till the primary civilizations emerged around 6,000 years ago. But new discoveries keep on pushing that horizon back.”
Graham Hancock’s ‘Ancient Apocalypse’ has him traveling from Indonesia to Mexico to Malta.
In the primary episode of Ancient Apocalypse, Graham journeys to Indonesia to appear for proof of a lost civilization and a “potential cataclysm that wiped it out,” in keeping with Netflix. And because the sequence progresses, he searches for clues about “human prehistory” at the international’s largest pyramid in Mexico, on the megalithic temples of Malta, and even at a fabled “street to Atlantis” off the coast of the United States. (And those are simply the first 4 episodes!)
Graham is also giving a lecture about “new proof of a global cataclysm” in London.
On Dec. 14, Graham will deliver a lecture, also titled “Ancient Apocalypse,” on the Royal Geographical Society in London. The match will be hosted via Alternatives, a nonprofit group that bills itself because the United Kingdom’s longest-running weekly mind-body-spirit occasions company.
“Our notions of the past are the principles on which we imagine our long run. But what if vital ideals that we presently dangle about our personal ‘prehistory’ are incomplete — or just simple improper?” Alternatives says in a description of the event. “In the sunshine of new archaeological discoveries, and compelling new evidence of a international cataclysm at the end of the remaining Ice Age, Graham Hancock provides a radical rethink and makes the case for an enlarged imaginative and prescient of the previous.”
His perspectives have sparked controversy, to say the least.
As The Telegraph famous in a 2015 profile on Graham, the journalist — a former correspondent for The Economist — has observed his theories criticized via archaeologists for decades. He’s been called a pseudo-archaeologist or even a “Pyramidiot” and compared, unfavorably, to The Da Vinci Code creator Dan Brown.
In a University of Kansas news release about Ancient Apocalypse, anthropology professor John Hoopes says there’s a difference between medical archaeology and “the public vernacular perception of archaeology, which includes historical extraterrestrial beings and shows on the History Channel and Graham Hancock’s books and the stuff that you in finding in the grocery checkout counter or the airport ebook rack.”
Graham Hancock wrote an whole guide about how Atlantis was once actually shaped via refugees from a meteor strike on Mars.
He says the "face on Mars" and the "martian pyramids" are actual evidence there was once a civilization there.
Source: I personal a copy. pic.twitter.com/GOdxDK66eW
— Jeff Yates (@Jeff__yates) November 14, 2022And a 2018 blog post from the Southern Poverty Law Center in comparison Hancock’s work to the speculation of historical astronauts, which is “some of the extra elaborate theories in pseudo-history with a racist part,” according to historian Jason Colavito.
But criticisms don’t trouble Graham that much. “I unquestionably don’t relish them however I don’t resent them either," he informed The Telegraph in 2015. “If you put out an bizarre reinterpretation of the previous, then you can be expecting those who have invested their whole careers studying the human previous to say,’ Hang on a minute.’”
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7pbXSramam6Ses7p6wqikaKhfnL%2BitMCmZKGZnpi8pLeMmqWcoZWjwW6tz6iamqSppcCm